Written by olsonaplc-2caSchool: Sioux Central
In Rehberg v. Paulk, Paulk was lying to the hospital. Rehberg wanted money for it because he was being lied to and had valse info. I think that Rehberg should be entitled to money because he had been lied to by a hospital and Paulk. Rehberg had to go back to court two more times for the same thing and each time got off because of false testimony. How would you like it if you were taken to court for something you did not do. If i was taken to court for something that i did not do and they had false information i would be really upset and i would want something back after i was found innocent. Then if i was taken to court another two more times for the same thing on false testimony again i would be furious and i would definitely want something back.